|
|
 |
BRIEF EXPLANATION: What I’d like to discuss with you today is your needs and use of Seismic Data Processing services. The research is sponsored by a group of the leading service suppliers in this field. They need your input to plan how they should improve in order to provide you with the level and types of products and services you require and deserve. Kimberlite acts as an unbiased, third party to collect, aggregate and analyze the data and your personal anonymity is assured. The results of this study are taken very seriously, and this is an opportunity to voice your needs and opinions to shape the development of new technologies and services for this market. As a professional courtesy, a complimentary report summary will be shared with all respondents upon completion of the project.
|
 |
1. |
Tell us your name!
This information is kept anonymous and is used only for internal purposes. |
2. |
Company
This information is kept anonymous and is used only for internal purposes. |
3. |
What geographic regions are you involved with?
Region 1 |
|
Region 2 |
|
Region 3 |
|
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
4. |
What geographic regions are you involved with?
|
|
Region 1 |
| | | | |
Region 2 |
| | | | |
Region 3 |
| | | | |
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
5. |
Which emerging seismic data processing technologies do you believe have the greatest potential to improve image quality, provide higher resolution or provide time & cost savings benefits for your geoscience operations? In other words, what’s the next “Big Thing”?
|
6. |
What percent of your seismic data processing work is performed in-house and what percent is outsourced to 3rd party suppliers?
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
7. |
What software packages do you use for in-house seismic data processing?
|
8. |
What percent of the wells you plan to drill over the next 2 years will be frontier exploration wells, what percent will be step-out exploration wells, what percent will be appraisal wells and what percent will be development wells?
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
9. |
Approximately what do you expect your expenditures for seismic data processing and related services to be in 2025?
|
10. |
Compared to the previous 12 months, will your company see increases, decreases or no changes in seismic data processing expenditures over the next 12 months?
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
11. |
What about longer term, say 5 to 10 years from now? Do you expect seismic data processing expenditures to increase, decrease or remain unchanged? Why?
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
12. |
Do you expect supplier pricing for seismic data processing services to increase, decrease or stay about the same over the next 12 months? By what percent?
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
13. |
What percent of your seismic data processing expenditures are allocated for processing proprietary data and what percent for re-processing multiclient data?
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
14. |
For new proprietary projects, what percent of your seismic processing is bundled with the acquisition supplier?
|
15. |
What percent of your multiclient data is re-processed by the original data supplier, what percent is re-processed by a 3rd party and what percent is re-processed in-house?
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
16. |
What percent of the drilling & development projects your company has planned over the next 2-3 years have sufficient quality seismic data to assess the opportunity?
|
17. |
What percent of the projects with insufficient seismic data will require new seismic data acquisition?
|
18. |
What percent of the projects with insufficient seismic data will require reprocessing reimaging of your existing seismic data?
|
19. |
What percent of your seismic data processing is currently performed accessing the Cloud?
|
20. |
What Cloud vendors are you currently using?
(If other, list in comments)
Please select {0} response(s)
Other Cloud Vendor(s)? An answer is required
|
21. |
Do you prefer to have your processed seismic data delivered via the Cloud?
|
22. |
Who is your preferred vendor?
(If other, list in comments)
An answer is required
Other Cloud Vendor? An answer is required
|
23. |
What workflows or processes do you feel can benefit the most from advances in machine learning/ AI?
|
24. |
Do you feel that the seismic data processing suppliers, third-party software providers or your in-house teams are best suited to meet your future AI needs for seismic data processing?
|
LAND SECTION
|
25. |
What are the top one or two biggest challenges you face in processing land seismic data?
|
26. |
What percent of your land seismic data processing projects will target the following formations or play types over the next 2 years?
Conventional Oil or Gas Play |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Unconventional Oil or Gas Play |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Heavy Oil |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Geothermal |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Carbon Capture |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Other |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
| 0 |
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
27. |
What percent of your Land seismic data processing budget is allocated for 2D Data? What percent for 3D Data? What percent for Multi Component/ 3C Data? What percent for 4D processing?
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
28. |
Do you plan on acquiring any land seismic data over the next 12-24 months?
|
29. |
How many miles (or kilometers) of NEW land seismic data will you acquire over the next 12-24 months that will need to be processed?
|
|
2D Data | | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
3D Data Using Cabled Systems | | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
3D Data Using Cable-Less Systems | | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Multi-Component/ 3C Data | | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
30. |
What percent of the land seismic data acquired will be used for 4D to manage or monitor the reservoir (Including CCS Projects)?
|
31. |
What trends are you seeing in land seismic data acquisition parameters? (Ultra-high density, longer offset, broader band, etc)
|
MARINE SECTION
|
32. |
What are the top one or two biggest challenges you face in processing marine seismic data?
|
33. |
What percent of your marine seismic data processing projects will target the following formations or play types over the next 2 years?
Conventional Oil or Gas Play |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Sub-Salt or Pre-Salt |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Carbonates |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Carbon Capture |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Other |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
| 0 |
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
34. |
What percent of your Marine seismic data processing budget is allocated for the following?
2D Data |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Conventional Towed Streamer 3D Data |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Broadband or Multi-Sensor Towed Streamer 3D Data |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Ocean Bottom Cable Data (OBC) |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Ocean Bottom Node Data (OBN) |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Sparse Node with Long Offset and Large Coverage |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
4D Data |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
| 0 |
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
35. |
What percent of the OBC or OBN data collected is processed as 4 component?
|
36. |
Did you process and merge this data with existing Narrow Azimuth or Wide Azimuth data?
|
37. |
Do you plan on acquiring any marine seismic data over the next 12-24 months?
|
38. |
How many miles (or kilometers) of NEW marine seismic data will you acquire over the next 12-24 months that will need to be processed?
|
|
2D Data | | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Conventional Towed Streamer 3D Data | | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Broadband or Multi-Sensor Towed Streamer 3D Data | | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Ocean Bottom Cable Data (OBC) | | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Ocean Bottom Node Data (OBN) | | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Sparse Node with Long Offset and Large Coverage | | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
39. |
What percent of the marine seismic data acquired will be used for 4D to manage or monitor the reservoir (Including CCS Projects)?
|
SUPPLIER IMAGE AND TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP
|
40. |
Which seismic data processing supplier do you feel is the leader for the following performance and image factors?
Time Imaging & Velocity Modeling | | | | | | | | | |
Reverse Time Migration | | | | | | | | | |
Depth Imaging & Velocity Modeling | | | | | | | | | |
Multiple Attenuation | | | | | | | | | |
De-Blending Simultaneous Sources | | | | | | | | | |
FWI (Full Waveform Inversion) | | | | | | | | | |
Multi-Component Processing | | | | | | | | | |
4D/ Time Lapse Processing | | | | | | | | | |
Wide or Full Azimuth Towed Streamer Processing | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Bottom Node Processing | | | | | | | | | |
Sparse Node Processing | | | | | | | | | |
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
41. |
Which seismic data processing supplier do you feel is the leader for the following performance and image factors?
Best Problem Solvers | | | | | | | | | |
Overall, Delivers Best Image | | | | | | | | | |
Best On-Time Delivery | | | | | | | | | |
Provides Reliable and Impartial Technical Advice | | | | | | | | | |
Most Up-To-Date Technology | | | | | | | | | |
Offers the Most Advanced AI & Machine Learning Capabilities | | | | | | | | | |
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
TIME MODELING AND TIME IMAGING
|
42. |
Over the next 12 months, approximately what percent of your seismic data processing projects will use the following time modeling & time imaging techniques?
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
DEPTH MODELING AND DEPTH IMAGING
|
43. |
Over the next 12 months, approximately what percent of your seismic data processing projects will use the following depth modeling & depth imaging techniques?
Interactive Anisotropic Velocity Analysis |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Automated Anisotropic Velocity Analysis |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Horizon Based Velocity Analysis |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Tomographic Inversion |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Least Squares Migration |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Kirchhoff Isotropic Pre-Stack Depth Migration |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Kirchhoff Anisotropic Pre-Stack Depth Migration |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Anisotropic Reverse Time Migration |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
44. |
What share of your projects are using the following types of FWI techniques? (If Used) Did this technique provide great, moderate, slight or no real improvement versus other techniques?
|
|
Elastic FWI |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | | | | |
High Frequency FWI |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | | | | |
Time-Lag FWI |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | | | | |
FWI for 4D Work |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | | | | |
Multi-Parameter FWI |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | | | | |
Invalid number of answers for some rowsYour entries do not add to the required value
|
RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION TEHCNIQUES
|
45. |
Over the next 12 months, approximately what percent of your seismic data processing projects will use the following reservoir characterization techniques?
Rock Properties Derivation |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
AVO |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
DHI (Direct Hydrocarbon Indicators) |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Reservoir Delineation/ Extent |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
4D/ Time Lapse Processing |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
46. |
What percent of your reservoir characterization projects are outsourced?
|
OTHER TECHNIQUES
|
47. |
Over the next 12 months, approximately what percent of your seismic data processing projects will use these other seismic data processing techniques?
Multi-Component Processing |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Imaging with Multiples |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Imaging with FWI |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
5D Regularization |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Specialized Interbed Multiple Attenuation |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Simultaneous Source De-Blending |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Shallow Hazard/ Survey Processing |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Illumination Studies |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
48. |
A. Which suppliers have you used for SEISMIC DATA PROCESSING over the past 12 months? B. Approximately what percent of your business (in dollars) was awarded to each supplier? C. Why was this supplier chosen over others for this most recent job?
| |
BGP | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | An answer is required |
DUG | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | An answer is required |
PGS | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | An answer is required |
SAE Exploration | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | An answer is required |
SLB/ WesternGeco | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | An answer is required |
Shearwater | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | An answer is required |
TGS | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | An answer is required |
Viridien (CGG) | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | An answer is required |
Other 1 | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | An answer is required |
Other 2 | | |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
| | An answer is required |
| | | 0 |
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
49. |
Who is the "OTHER" company(s) that you use for SEISMIC DATA PROCESSING?
|
50. |
How would you rate the seismic data processing suppliers you are currently using on the following performance factors? How likely would you be to recommend those suppliers to a friend or colleague? (10=Would definitely recommend, 0=Would definitely not recommend)
Track Record/ Experience with Similar Data |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Experience of Specific Processor Working with Your Data |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Turnaround Time |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Overall Image Quality |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Technical Support/ Ability to Work with Problem Data |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Responsive to Needs |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Employing State-of-the-Art Technology |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Price Competitiveness |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Likely to Recommend |
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Invalid numberAn answer is requiredValue out of range
|
Your entries do not add to the required value
Do you have any additional feedback on the suppliers you are using for your SEISMIC DATA PROCESSING? An answer is required
|
51. |
What do you find to be the STRONGEST and WEAKEST attributes of the following Seismic Data Processing suppliers?
BGP | An answer is required | An answer is required |
DUG | An answer is required | An answer is required |
PGS | An answer is required | An answer is required |
SAE Exploration | An answer is required | An answer is required |
SLB/ WesternGeco | An answer is required | An answer is required |
Shearwater | An answer is required | An answer is required |
TGS | An answer is required | An answer is required |
Viridien (CGG) | An answer is required | An answer is required |
Other | An answer is required | An answer is required |
Your entries do not add to the required value
|
52. |
In closing, if you could communicate only one message to seismic data processing suppliers, what would that be? What would make a substantial and positive improvement to your company’s operations?
| An answer is required | |
|
|
There are errors in the page. Please correct the errors before moving forward.
|
|
|
|